266 results found

1. SourceGuardian for PHP 7.4

   Please add SourceGuardian extension (https://www.sourceguardian.com/loaders.html).

   Thank you.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. LVE Dashboard Endusers Reaching Limits | please separate Domains(Panel) user vs System Users

   Hello, My suggestion is to seperate Domain ( panel Endusers) from system Endusers.

   example: when you go to your LVE Dashboard you see Endusers Reaching Limits 4/21

   this number on the left is a symbol that 4 endusers are reaching limits and the 21 is total domain(panel) users and system users.
   this was very confusing at first, cause I had only 10 domains and the day prior was showing 0/15 so I thought why 15?

   I only have 10 domains and 5 subdomains so I thought ok it makes sense 15

   Then the next day I see 2/21 and think no way I never added any domains or subdomains. so where is 6 more users coming from?

   then I found out these are also system users. which I thought should be seperated.
   for 2 reasons:
   1. it would be nice to know only domains and (panel) endusers
   2. another section for only system endusers reaching limits.

   if we have resellers we can add an option to only allow resellers to view their domain (panel) endusers and not the system endusers since only root can adjust system users in LVE.

   Example:
   when we go to LVE dashboard and look at the plugin
   Endusers reaching limits we would have 2 sections in that plugin

   1. would be domains (Panel) users only 2/10
      1. below would have system users 0/11
   2. first one would show my true count of domains which is 10 domains
   3. second line would show system users which are 11

   next to the number stats in the plugin 2/10 and 0/11, we would have the Details link for each.

   when we click details a separate page to show only domains limits
   and also another Details to the system endusers limits

   • This will take all the confusion out of these stats and be very helpful to understanding where the issues are.. in domains or system users

   also will give more precedence to system Endusers reaching limits, because this would cause more issues to our servers and we might want to look at that first before we look at a domain endusers reaching limits.

   all of this would be great to create a notification email for system Endusers reaching limits to be sent to @root.server or admins email to let us know there is a System Enduser Reaching limits and we need to login to see what the problem is...

   • We also have the reseller aspect of this. we can give resellers a plugin to view LVE only domains ( panel) so they are aware of their accounts and what domains - Endusers Reaching Limits..

   they don't need to view our system Endusers reaching limits since they can't adjust those or do anything about that

   Thanks for reading hope you can UpVote this idea.

   • I was on a support request and asked about this and they said:

   "Perhaps the separation would be practical in terms of understanding the completeness of the situation, but earlier this functionality was not required and therefore we did not work on its implementation.
   "
   So they suggested I put in a request here for this new feature.

   So please upvote will make things much clearer for all of us

   Kind Regards,
   Spiro G

   Hello, My suggestion is to seperate Domain ( panel Endusers) from system Endusers.

   example: when you go to your LVE Dashboard you see Endusers Reaching Limits 4/21

   this number on the left is a symbol that 4 endusers are reaching limits and the 21 is total domain(panel) users and system users.
   this was very confusing at first, cause I had only 10 domains and the day prior was showing 0/15 so I thought why 15?

   I only have 10 domains and 5 subdomains so I thought ok it makes sense 15

   Then the next day I see 2/21 and think… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Add dotnet/asp.net core selector - with proxy support

   Add a selector like the NodeJs/Python selector to run self-contained dotnet/asp.net core executables with proxy support so they can be run with HTTPS.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Option to add domain with SSL certificate and key through Imunify360 interface for standalone installation/non-panel/ISPConfig

   Recently come across an issue where I installed Imunify360 on a server with ISPConfig - followed instructions for non-panel/standalone installation.

   Therefore, after successfull installation, all domains which worked well using Cloudflare CA Origin Certificate, Authenticated Origin Pulls and were on Full (Strict) SSL option, went "offline" or "error 526 invalitd certificate".

   When I stopped imunify360-webshield service, then error 521 occured.

   Furthermore, regarding Ticket support and Webshield not being configured, I was instructed to manually add domains and their certificates and keys for ssl-cache.

   This process is exhausting, either.

   It would be really nice to have a feature like an option or a field in the Imunify360 dashboard/interface to add them.

   Something like steps below:
   1. Enter (sub)domain name
   2. Choose option:
   a) upload a txt file of a cert and key for it
   or
   b) provide/specify the path to the ssl cert and key on the server
   3. Save

   Simple and easy.

   Temporarly I have disabled Webshield to make the domains work until I test that for one domain, if upon success, will make for all of them (manually) and keep it enabled regarding Cloudflare.

   Recently come across an issue where I installed Imunify360 on a server with ISPConfig - followed instructions for non-panel/standalone installation.

   Therefore, after successfull installation, all domains which worked well using Cloudflare CA Origin Certificate, Authenticated Origin Pulls and were on Full (Strict) SSL option, went "offline" or "error 526 invalitd certificate".

   When I stopped imunify360-webshield service, then error 521 occured.

   Furthermore, regarding Ticket support and Webshield not being configured, I was instructed to manually add domains and their certificates and keys for ssl-cache.

   This process is exhausting, either.

   It would be really nice to have a feature like an option… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. inodes limit assigned to reseller sub accounts

   Currently Cloudlinux is not applying default Inodes limit to the accounts created by Reseller in Cpanel. The limits assign to reseller package should be inherited by all accounts created by reseller account manager. this will limit excessive usage of INODES.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. See usage stats in cPanel

   I am suggesting a feature where the clients are able to the Current Usage and so on for their site when going to their cPanel.

   Just like we are doing from the WHM.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Limit reseller sub accounts instead of whole cumulative limits in reseller limits

   Hello,

   Reseller limits puts a restriction on cumulative resources of all sub accounts. There should be a feature which allows host to set limits for each sub accounts of a reseller instead of all cumulative.

   Example: Reseller X is set to have 2GB RAM, 2 Core CPU.

   All his sub accounts should have the same limit instead if default limits.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. mysql governor user_max_connections limit per user

   Currently, you can only set usermaxconnections in governor globally.
   It would be great if we could set this limit also at the user level, as with the CPU limit.
   For example:
   <user mode="restrict" name="blablabla">
   <limit user_max_connections="150"/>
   </user>

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. re-support the xen hypervisor

   I looked through the documentation and CL6 had direct support for Xen. XCP-NG is a fork tat is binary compatible and is built directly from the xen hypervisor. You can either grab xcp-ng tools and include their guest tools into cl7 and 8..:)

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Add short codes to PHP X-RAY

    Currently when a slow loading time is detected PHP X-RAY will report slow system functions "pregreplacecallback" at file /wp-includes/shortcodes.php:228

    It would be nice to know which shortcode was called so customers can easily determine what is causing the slow load time.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Hello, please add a separate php selection for sub domains ... and create a separate email for sub domains ...

    Hello, please add a separate php selection for sub domains ... and create a separate email for sub domains ...

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Make it possible to disable PHP versions for specific users

    It would be nice for example to not offer very old versions to new customers, because this mostly gives a bad user-experience. Newer versions are faster and more secure.
    It can also be used to slowly phase out an older version, by disabling it for every customer not using it.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Better CPU usage

    I copied the following text from a competitor site:
    "Unused dedicated resources are automatically re-allocated to eliminate waste. Also, when limit-exceeding users are “jailed,” they are not automatically throttled. They share jail core resources, so if the jail has few members, their CPU access may increase. This protects the masses while helping, when possible, those with even higher demands. In addition, users and programs may use swap space beyond their physical RAM memory usage limits."

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Bandwidth control, per-user-bandwidth limits for cloudLinux users.

    Bandwidth, per-user-bandwidth limits for cloudLinux users.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Friendly Error for CageFS Without alt-php

    Today if one installs CageFS without alt-php, the PHP selector still appears in end users' cPanel interfaces, and gives the error:

    Config file (Cannot read /etc/cl.selector/selector.conf: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/cl.selector/selector.conf'. Native used) not found

    It would be great if it was turned off by default from the cPanel interface when alt-php modules aren't installed, and even if the admin chooses to add it, it should give a friendly error, like "No alternative PHP versions are installed on this server", in place of the existing error.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. performance tuning tool

    please make a performance tuning tool for cloudlinux: to optimize settings of the cl server based on apache/ls and database server load, internal memory and cpu power. it's now a lot of try and error and that's not the right method. someting as mysqltuner.pl but better and integrated in the cloudlinux panel inside Directadmin. A button with 'optimize all settings' would be nice. Just click and adjust everything automatically...

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. user want to see processor allocated

    Users want to verify the number of processor allocated if true/correct from SSH, or their cpanel account

    we would need something else than graph 100% who shows whatever is allocated : 150%, 200%, meaning 1.5 core or 2 cores

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. CloudLinux on AWS Deployment Guide

    A good documentation is always preferably to opening a ticket.
    Since Cloudlinux can't be installed directly on Amazon Linux and an official Cloudlinux + cPanel AMI must be used, it is important to have a documentation on that no matter how sparse it might be.

    Yes, it is as simple as finding the image and installing it but a link on your website will be great too especially it if deals with potentials pitfalls and why Cloudlinux can't be installed on Amazon Linux.

    Thank you!

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Ability to hide some PHP extensions in cPanel UI

    I would like to be able to hide some extensions from cPanel UI. We do not want to allow all extensions, and some of them are really not needed an may be confusing for clients.

    For example mssql is definitely not needed and can be misleading for clients. Also APC have no effect if PHP is run as SuPHP, and it can be confusing for clients. We would also remove pgsql since we do not support it, and again can be misleading. There are probably more that we do not want to offer.

    In addition to this it would also be nice to be able to lock some extension that can not be disabled, like for example Suhosin, but that is maybe not that important, but just something to maybe also consider since it is somehow connected to this request.

    I would like to be able to hide some extensions from cPanel UI. We do not want to allow all extensions, and some of them are really not needed an may be confusing for clients.

    For example mssql is definitely not needed and can be misleading for clients. Also APC have no effect if PHP is run as SuPHP, and it can be confusing for clients. We would also remove pgsql since we do not support it, and again can be misleading. There are probably more that we do not want to offer.

    In addition to this it would also… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Consistency of MEM reporting over lvetop, cpanel graphs, and cpanel reporting.

    Currently if a user has a process running which is causing data to be kept in system buffers or caches, cloudlinux works as follows...

    lvetop shows none of the memory being used.
    cPanel graph shows all of the memory used.
    cPanel text shows all of the memory used.

    When the process finishes...

    lvetop shows none of the memory being used.
    cPanel graph continues to show all of the memory used.
    cPanel text shows none of the memory being used.

    Gradually as the system buffers or caches clear (can be many hours for large memory)...

    cPanel graph slowly returns to 0 over many hours even though cPanel text has been showing 0 hours earlier.

    These 3 items should agree in memory usage reporting.

    It is particularly confusing for end-users to have text on a screen showing 0 memory usage while a graph lower down on the same screen is showing 2GB of memory usage.

    Currently if a user has a process running which is causing data to be kept in system buffers or caches, cloudlinux works as follows...

    lvetop shows none of the memory being used.
    cPanel graph shows all of the memory used.
    cPanel text shows all of the memory used.

    When the process finishes...

    lvetop shows none of the memory being used.
    cPanel graph continues to show all of the memory used.
    cPanel text shows none of the memory being used.

    Gradually as the system buffers or caches clear (can be many hours for large memory)...

    cPanel graph slowly returns to 0… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close