266 results found

1. Add md5 checksum to installer page

   Would be available on the page https://docs.kernelcare.com/installation/ in a text file or similar so users can cross reference the file has not be tampered with along the way.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. inodes limit assigned to reseller sub accounts

   Currently Cloudlinux is not applying default Inodes limit to the accounts created by Reseller in Cpanel. The limits assign to reseller package should be inherited by all accounts created by reseller account manager. this will limit excessive usage of INODES.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Make iops limit work the same on soft raid and non-raid devices

   It appears that if you try to write 512 blocks with iops limit = 1024 to soft raid you'll get x/2 performance than on a simple volume because on raid1 you write 2x blocks.
   Since from the client's perspective, soft raid volume is a single device and it would be logical to make iops limit work the same on soft raid and non-raid devices

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. A Prometheus exporter for DB Governor dbtop

   We need to integrate dbtop data into a nice centralized grafana chart that can be monitored more efficiently and users MySQL consumption can be compared to each other. so it would be a good idea to develop a Prometheus exporter for this reason.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Capture the thread of the process and show it on lve-read-snapshot

   Currently the thread of the process is also counted in lve's nproc, but the thread is not captured, so it's not shown on lve-read-snapshot and cpanel's resource usage plugin https://docs.cloudlinux.com/lve_manager/#resource-usage-client-plugin.

   We hope you can consider this as in some cases like nodejs process may spawn some threads and the user's can't check it on lve-read-snapshot

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Gathering Votes  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Imunify360 - background scanning schedule missing input field for custom path only, instead of scheduled scanning of each user

   Recently I have setup my background scanning schedule for a monthly period at specific date and time.

   Source:
   - https://docs.imunify360.com/dashboard/#background-scanning

   It would be really nice to make a field here on a scheduled background scan which path we would like to be scanned.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Imunify360 Firewall - Close all ports, except specified - missing IPv4 and IPv6 field for each port

   Recently came a cross the option in Imunify360 Firewall "Close all ports, except specified".

   But, I see we cannot define per port to allow our local IPv4 & IPv6.

   For example, MySQL 3306 needs only local IP and not external access.
   Why openning it for all?

   Moreover, like Redis 6379 or Memcached 11211, why open it to external ...

   Would be really nice if we could add our local IP, IPv4 and IPv6 per port when "close all ports, except specified".

   There is also a difference between stateful vs. stateless firewall too.

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Option to add domain with SSL certificate and key through Imunify360 interface for standalone installation/non-panel/ISPConfig

   Recently come across an issue where I installed Imunify360 on a server with ISPConfig - followed instructions for non-panel/standalone installation.

   Therefore, after successfull installation, all domains which worked well using Cloudflare CA Origin Certificate, Authenticated Origin Pulls and were on Full (Strict) SSL option, went "offline" or "error 526 invalitd certificate".

   When I stopped imunify360-webshield service, then error 521 occured.

   Furthermore, regarding Ticket support and Webshield not being configured, I was instructed to manually add domains and their certificates and keys for ssl-cache.

   This process is exhausting, either.

   It would be really nice to have a feature like an option or a field in the Imunify360 dashboard/interface to add them.

   Something like steps below:
   1. Enter (sub)domain name
   2. Choose option:
   a) upload a txt file of a cert and key for it
   or
   b) provide/specify the path to the ssl cert and key on the server
   3. Save

   Simple and easy.

   Temporarly I have disabled Webshield to make the domains work until I test that for one domain, if upon success, will make for all of them (manually) and keep it enabled regarding Cloudflare.

   Recently come across an issue where I installed Imunify360 on a server with ISPConfig - followed instructions for non-panel/standalone installation.

   Therefore, after successfull installation, all domains which worked well using Cloudflare CA Origin Certificate, Authenticated Origin Pulls and were on Full (Strict) SSL option, went "offline" or "error 526 invalitd certificate".

   When I stopped imunify360-webshield service, then error 521 occured.

   Furthermore, regarding Ticket support and Webshield not being configured, I was instructed to manually add domains and their certificates and keys for ssl-cache.

   This process is exhausting, either.

   It would be really nice to have a feature like an option… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Imunify360 feature request - block requests by ASN (IP to ASN lookup?)

   I was recently thinking about a security feature, like the current one where we can block IP addresses and ranges, and even countries from accessing our server IP and domains.

   But, was wondering, can we block providers by their's AS number (ASN) maybe?

   This could be good, for example, if we have "good traffic" from USA, but want to block all the IP addresses, or better to say, all the requests comming from the IP address(es) that belong to an specific AS number like DigitalOcean?

   Meaning, we allow all USA traffic, but block all from DigitalOcean by entering their ASN number?

   That feature would be great, if possible in any future.

   If you are currently doing some hostname to IP resolving or I do not know, using MaxMind Geo database - which I saw in tutorial how to setup it - which obviously helps to block Countries, right?

   I am not technicall expert, but maybe some way to integrate so we can enter the ASN and all the requests from it's IP addresses are being blocked.
   - something in the backend like IP to ASN lookup

   Regarding that, it would be great if possible, to either block a Web traffic, but even better to protect ports like SSH or FTP.

   Or, even to protect POP/IMAP ports from spammers or tools like port scans trying to connect just like there is a stretchoid which we currently see in our logs trying to scan/brute force our e-mail server.

   And yes, I did not consider the performance regarding the IP to ASN lookup, but ... if a client has got a dedicated server, I believe it can handle that.

   That way, the Imunify360 Firewall would be much more improved, if so, I believe.

   Thank you!

   I was recently thinking about a security feature, like the current one where we can block IP addresses and ranges, and even countries from accessing our server IP and domains.

   But, was wondering, can we block providers by their's AS number (ASN) maybe?

   This could be good, for example, if we have "good traffic" from USA, but want to block all the IP addresses, or better to say, all the requests comming from the IP address(es) that belong to an specific AS number like DigitalOcean?

   Meaning, we allow all USA traffic, but block all from DigitalOcean by entering their ASN… more

   17 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   4 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Recurring import of dynamic IPs for whitelisting of partner services

    UptimeRobot has a special subdomain (I cannot remember the name of it right now) that always is updated with the current IPs.

    It would be great if this special subdomain can be added and Imunify360 would each day do a re-import of the current IPs and remove old ones that are not used anymore.

    This would help us in the future to avoid false warnings about sites that are actually not down but it more that UptimeRobot have done changes in their IT structure.

    This will be great because we do manually have to add IPs and remove IPs in the future.

    We are using other services where this is relevant too :-)

    UptimeRobot has a special subdomain (I cannot remember the name of it right now) that always is updated with the current IPs.

    It would be great if this special subdomain can be added and Imunify360 would each day do a re-import of the current IPs and remove old ones that are not used anymore.

    This would help us in the future to avoid false warnings about sites that are actually not down but it more that UptimeRobot have done changes in their IT structure.

    This will be great because we do manually have to add IPs and remove IPs in… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Planned  ·  Vitalii Stavropolskyi responded

    Assigned id IFR-547. There is no ETA yet.

11. Front-end redis plugin for cPanel users

    Develop Redis Server Front-end Addon Manager for cPanel users, so the users could manage their Redis database instead of accessing terminal.

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gathering Votes  ·  2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Support for PHP 8.x

    Support for PHP 8.x

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Add QuickPatch+ to WHM/cPanel

    Hi,

    Currently QuickPatch+ only works in Plesk, please add him to WHM/cPanel because is most used and all our servers have this software.

    Thank you. Have a nice day!

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Add some features to "Centralized Monitoring" (CloudLinux OS+)

    Hi,

    I'm testing your CloudLinux OS+ tools and I think that you can add some features for do better the hosting provider investment from CloudLinux to CloudLixux OS+.

    1- The Centralized Monitoring are doing many tasks like Hetrixtools.com or other monitoring softwares, however not warn the sysadmins when a server are down and we need install anyway a additional softwares (for example Hetrixtools.com).

    Please, this is very easy for you, if you can add email/SMS notification when some server are down, we will can uninstall other tools.

    2- Also "Centralized Monitoring" not are checking the services (like LiteSpeed, MySQL, etc.) and we need install too more softwares for receive notifications if any service is down. If you can add him this will help the sysadmins.

    3- Also add information from Imunify360, because I have installed this software in all the servers but I want to have centralized all information (inclusive security).

    Thank you very much. Have a nice day.

    Hi,

    I'm testing your CloudLinux OS+ tools and I think that you can add some features for do better the hosting provider investment from CloudLinux to CloudLixux OS+.

    1- The Centralized Monitoring are doing many tasks like Hetrixtools.com or other monitoring softwares, however not warn the sysadmins when a server are down and we need install anyway a additional softwares (for example Hetrixtools.com).

    Please, this is very easy for you, if you can add email/SMS notification when some server are down, we will can uninstall other tools.

    2- Also "Centralized Monitoring" not are checking the services (like LiteSpeed, MySQL, etc.)… more

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Gathering Votes  ·  Vitalii Stavropolskyi responded

    Thank you for the ideas and for explaining specific cases.

15. Hey! Take a look!

    Maybe show me that there are notifications but dont auto open them. It is frustrating every time i go into the panel and bam 1/5th of my screen is no longer usable

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Add dotnet/asp.net core selector - with proxy support

    Add a selector like the NodeJs/Python selector to run self-contained dotnet/asp.net core executables with proxy support so they can be run with HTTPS.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Support Xen PVH in CloudlinuxOS 8/AlmaLinux

    Currently I work with Xen PVH in Cloudlinux and CentOS 7 with an optimal performance (https://en.bmstu.wiki/File:XenModes.png).

    And now I wolud Iike upgrade to CloudlinuxOS 8 but seems Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.x and its clones (like CentOS Linux) can't run as Xen PV DomU anymore. Xen PV guest support has been disabled for all 8.x releases :(

    So I suggest included Xen PV guest support again at least in AlmaLinux (because CentOS 8 will be discontinued shortly)

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. use iptables and clean iptable rules in IM360

    Due to a recent issue withim360 we noticed IM360 firewall is not using iptables, instead is injecting rules into memory without saving them, so if the IM360 service fail and iptables doesn't fail to start, you'll be locked out until imunify360 does. So please re think to use iptables in your firewall. We was using CSF before....we removed CSF and installed IM360, someone could think this action will clean all the blocking rules in the process...well no, looks like after we have uninstalled CSF and installed IM360 and probably restarted Im360 a lot of times....iptable old rules never were cleaned...we noticed this months after when an ip was being blocked without any logic reason. Thanx!

    Due to a recent issue withim360 we noticed IM360 firewall is not using iptables, instead is injecting rules into memory without saving them, so if the IM360 service fail and iptables doesn't fail to start, you'll be locked out until imunify360 does. So please re think to use iptables in your firewall. We was using CSF before....we removed CSF and installed IM360, someone could think this action will clean all the blocking rules in the process...well no, looks like after we have uninstalled CSF and installed IM360 and probably restarted Im360 a lot of times....iptable old rules never were cleaned...we… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. LVE Dashboard Endusers Reaching Limits | please separate Domains(Panel) user vs System Users

    Hello, My suggestion is to seperate Domain ( panel Endusers) from system Endusers.

    example: when you go to your LVE Dashboard you see Endusers Reaching Limits 4/21

    this number on the left is a symbol that 4 endusers are reaching limits and the 21 is total domain(panel) users and system users.
    this was very confusing at first, cause I had only 10 domains and the day prior was showing 0/15 so I thought why 15?

    I only have 10 domains and 5 subdomains so I thought ok it makes sense 15

    Then the next day I see 2/21 and think no way I never added any domains or subdomains. so where is 6 more users coming from?

    then I found out these are also system users. which I thought should be seperated.
    for 2 reasons:
    1. it would be nice to know only domains and (panel) endusers
    2. another section for only system endusers reaching limits.

    if we have resellers we can add an option to only allow resellers to view their domain (panel) endusers and not the system endusers since only root can adjust system users in LVE.

    Example:
    when we go to LVE dashboard and look at the plugin
    Endusers reaching limits we would have 2 sections in that plugin

    1. would be domains (Panel) users only 2/10
       1. below would have system users 0/11
    2. first one would show my true count of domains which is 10 domains
    3. second line would show system users which are 11

    next to the number stats in the plugin 2/10 and 0/11, we would have the Details link for each.

    when we click details a separate page to show only domains limits
    and also another Details to the system endusers limits

    • This will take all the confusion out of these stats and be very helpful to understanding where the issues are.. in domains or system users

    also will give more precedence to system Endusers reaching limits, because this would cause more issues to our servers and we might want to look at that first before we look at a domain endusers reaching limits.

    all of this would be great to create a notification email for system Endusers reaching limits to be sent to @root.server or admins email to let us know there is a System Enduser Reaching limits and we need to login to see what the problem is...

    • We also have the reseller aspect of this. we can give resellers a plugin to view LVE only domains ( panel) so they are aware of their accounts and what domains - Endusers Reaching Limits..

    they don't need to view our system Endusers reaching limits since they can't adjust those or do anything about that

    Thanks for reading hope you can UpVote this idea.

    • I was on a support request and asked about this and they said:

    "Perhaps the separation would be practical in terms of understanding the completeness of the situation, but earlier this functionality was not required and therefore we did not work on its implementation.
    "
    So they suggested I put in a request here for this new feature.

    So please upvote will make things much clearer for all of us

    Kind Regards,
    Spiro G

    Hello, My suggestion is to seperate Domain ( panel Endusers) from system Endusers.

    example: when you go to your LVE Dashboard you see Endusers Reaching Limits 4/21

    this number on the left is a symbol that 4 endusers are reaching limits and the 21 is total domain(panel) users and system users.
    this was very confusing at first, cause I had only 10 domains and the day prior was showing 0/15 so I thought why 15?

    I only have 10 domains and 5 subdomains so I thought ok it makes sense 15

    Then the next day I see 2/21 and think… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Best Place to Buy Email Lists

    Access the comprehensive and well-verified email lists from InfoGlobalData. Best Place to Buy Email Lists

    https://www.infoglobaldata.com/best-place-to-buy-email-lists

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close